8 new messages in 4 topics - abridged

sci.philosophy.tech http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.philosophy.tech

Today's most active topics:

* Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" - 5 new http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.philosophy.tech/browse_thread/thread/cbaffc8f9c5759c9

* Call for native speakers of English - 1 new http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.philosophy.tech/browse_thread/thread/11c6ebadff15e43b

* Philosophy of Math - 1 new http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.philosophy.tech/browse_thread/thread/c1a90b38887595ce

* Sign up for a great free science e-newsletter! - 1 new http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.philosophy.tech/browse_thread/thread/ff6611f97ec6f9c1

Active Topics -------------

Call for native speakers of English - 1 new ------------------------------------------- Am I so stupid or is four hours in total more as enough to make the results worthless? This is about people who like to spend 4 hours on a random task? How will this generate objective numbers? English people don't know what an argument is. The word is used in more languages as one could shake a stick at. It is clarifying your opinion - Mon, Feb 28 2005 12:37 am 1 message, 1 author http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.philosophy.tech/browse_thread/thread/11c6ebadff15e43b

Philosophy of Math - 1 new -------------------------- Can someone explain how does Penelope Maddy define "empty set"? Thnx! - Mon, Feb 28 2005 2:18 pm 1 message, 1 author http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.philosophy.tech/browse_thread/thread/c1a90b38887595ce

Sign up for a great free science e-newsletter! - 1 new ------------------------------------------------------ [link] Invalid domain name??? - Mon, Feb 28 2005 3:26 pm 1 message, 1 author http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.philosophy.tech/browse_thread/thread/ff6611f97ec6f9c1

Ambiguity in the "Affine Connection" - 5 new -------------------------------------------- In <1109541784.163102.62...@g14g2 000cwa.googlegroups.com> ...O'Barr comments: However correct or incorrect it might be for what you just said, you did not answer the first question: is this 'collisionless gas' a real gas or just a mathematical assumption? Did you forget this question? On purpose? - Mon, Feb 28 2005 11:30 am 5 messages, 3 authors http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.philosophy.tech/browse_thread/thread/cbaffc8f9c5759c9

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sci.philosophy.tech" group.

To post to this group, send email to sci.philosophy.tech@googlegroups.com or visit http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.philosophy.tech

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sci.philosophy.tech-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.philosophy.tech/subscribe

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

============================================================================== Google Groups: http://groups-beta.google.com